A claim has been made that imprisoned journalist Julian Assange could be freed within the next two months, giving supporters hope that 'enough is enough'. Dr John Jiggens reports.
ON NEW YEAR'S DAY 2023, John Lyons, global affairs editor of the ABC, made the extraordinary prediction that within the next two months, WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange would be released.
Lyons gave no further details and the Albanese Government has avoided repeated requests for confirmation of this remarkable claim, maintaining the mantra that these are matters that rely on careful negotiations between states and need to be dealt with by "quiet diplomacy".
However, it is unlikely that a senior journalist for Australia's national broadcaster would make such a bold and courageous prediction unless it had been leaked to him by someone he regarded as a credible source close to the Government.
Who might the leaker be?
The obvious candidate is the Albanese Government.
The problem with quiet diplomacy is that people can easily mistake it for no diplomacy and call it such. The Government needed to provide its critics with evidence and feedback that it was pursuing the release of Assange, and the leak has more than achieved this.
Assange's family and supporters were clearly delighted with the prediction, though the more sceptical found it difficult to believe that the long persecution could be nearing its end. Assange's father, John Shipton, cited Albanese's parliamentary reply to Kooyong Independent Monique Ryan on 30 November, who asked if the Government would intervene to bring Assange home. Albanese's reply was "enough is enough. It is time for this matter to be brought to a conclusion".
John Shipton referenced this Albanese statement in his response:
PM's words offer hope to Assange faithful
In Parliament recently, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese gave his most powerful statement yet in response to a question about Julian Assange's persecution.
No contradiction of the leak came from the U.S. side; neither from the President, the CIA who had initiated the Espionage Act prosecution, nor any branch of the National Security state. The silence of these "lambs" was remarkable.
So what has changed on the U.S. side? They would have been consulted about the leak, so presumably, they are happy that it will provide a face-saving exit.
The U.S. legal team won the judicial battle to extradite Assange, so it may wish to quit while winning, with the legal precedent established for extradition under the Espionage Act, rather than facing the possibility of a successful challenge from Assange's legal team. After corralling and torturing Assange for 13 years, the U.S. could easily agree with Albanese that "enough is enough" and Assange (and journalists everywhere) had been taught a sufficiently chilling lesson.
By releasing Assange, the Biden administration could even pose as champions of journalism and defenders of the first amendment by dropping the Espionage Act charges against Assange. The Times, The Guardian, Le Monde, Der Spiegel and El Pais (all WikiLeaks partners in publishing the material) have recently urged this because of the threat it poses to a free press and to all of them. It also has the additional benefit of lavishing upon Anthony Albanese and his government an enormous public relations gift - the return of one slightly damaged Australian citizen named Julian Assange.
This year, Australia will witness an unprecedented U.S. charm offensive. In March, former President Barack Obama will undertake a two-city tour of Australia. In May, Biden himself will be in Sydney for the Quad meeting to sign Australia up for the coming war with China. This will require purchasing massive quantities of extraordinarily expensive U.S. hardware. Streets filled with angry Assange supporters would not send the necessary message of Australian support for U.S. global ambitions.
Albanese questions pointless legal action against Assange
While the PM continues to voice his support for Julian Assange, some are concerned that our allegiance to the USA has become an obstacle to action being taken.
Complimentary as he was to the Albanese Government, John Shipton's assessment of previous governments was scathing:
Shipton was critical of the role of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT), which also includes the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), and he was pleased their influence had been superseded by the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (PM&C)in the hierarchy of administration in Canberra.
Assange's lawyer urges political action in powerful address
Lawyer for Assange, Jennifer Robinson, delivered an address at the National Press Club pleading for an 'urgent political solution'.
Dr John Jiggens is a writer and journalist currently working in the community newsroom at Bay-FM in Byron Bay.