Australian protesters at Pine Gap argue that civil disobedience is justified when secrecy, surveillance and alliance politics entangle Australia in mass civilian killing in Gaza, writes DrBinoy Kampmark.

WHILE THE SECRET SIGNALS and surveillance facility atPine Gapin Northern Australia, officially named the Joint Defence Facility Pine Gap (JDFPG), is billed as a joint affair between Australia and the United States, it is nothing of the sort.

Just as offices direct the callow intern to make the coffee, Australian officials remain Americas permanent interns, helpful, certainly, but never powerful or given challenging roles. The contempt with which Australians are treated is evident in the level of secrecy that continues to shroud one of the largest signals intelligence centres outside the United States.

It is this secrecy that, on occasion, finds its way into court. For this, we can thank those plucky protesters who have, over the years, sought to expose the role of the base in aiding U.S. military operations against targets in any number of locations unbeknownst to the Australian Parliament, not even the Australian Prime Minister and Cabinet.

Two of those protestors,Carmen Escobar Robinson and Tommy Walker, brought attention to the bases activities when theyblocked Hatt Road, the main access route to Pine Gap, in October 2023. On 27 November 2023, a second effort was made that temporarily prevented some 100 Pine Gap employees from entering the facility.

An agreement authorising the U.S. militarisation of Australia needs to be terminated before our nation is dragged into war.

Robinson and Walker were part of a group of 50 activists, an eclectic makeup of health workers, community members and the Arrernte Traditional Owners, all steered by the social justice outfitMparntwe for Falastin. The action had been enlivened by revelations from an ex-Pine Gap employee that intelligence from the base was finding its way to Israeli sources.

The revelations, published inDeclassified Australiaby Peter Cronau, came fromDavid Rosenberg, a veteran of the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA) who performed the role of team leader of weapon signals analysis at Pine Gap for 18 years till 2008.

Rosenberg stated:

Personnel at the base were tasked to gather such signals pertaining to Hamas command and control centres in Gaza. Their aim would be to minimise casualties to non-combatants in achieving their objective of destroying Hamas, given the proximity of such centres to civilian infrastructure such as schools and hospitals. (This claim proved over time to be aspirational, given the staggering civilian death toll arising from Israeli strikes.)

Cronau had previously obtained evidence of the role played by Pine Gap in supplying geolocation data to the U.S. military for targeting purposes from an NSAdocumentfrom August 2012 entitled Site Profile G, stemming from the archive of former NSA contractorEdward Snowdenand first published in the Australian Broadcasting Corporation programBackground Briefingin 2017.

The documentstates:

These signals, writes Cronau, constitute the communications data of radar and weapons systems collected in near-real time. Pine Gap, with its satellites so strategically positioned to monitor the Middle East region, along with its targeting and analysis capability, was bound to be valuable to Israel.

With the U.S. steadily descending into political chaos and social decline, Australia's independence has never been more important.

Robinson and Walker were subsequentlychargedwith summary offences for the second action, comprising loitering, causing a hazard on the road and blocking the use of a public road. On 23 September 2025, they pleaded not guilty to the charges, arguing that the obstruction had been staged to prevent the offence of genocide in Palestine.

In his ruling, Judge John McBridefoundthe two protesters exemplary citizens in dedication to their cause despite finding them guilty of loitering. (The prosecution dropped the obstruction charges late in 2024.)

McBride ruled:

The defencemadeby the duos lawyer, John Lawrence, resorted to the Northern TerritorysCriminal Code Act, which stipulates that force in this case a blockade can be justified in certain circumstances, one of them being to prevent the commission of an offence. Robinson and Walker hadcommitted their actswith intent because it was their view, their belief, their understanding that what was going on in Pine Gap was an offence. The Crown was unable to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendants werent moving in order to prevent genocide.

ProfessorRichard Tanterof theNautilus Institute, an untiring student of Pine Gaps cloaked activities, was called upon to give evidence on the facilitys role. This,arguedCrown prosecutorMachiko Raheem, was not relevant to the defence of applying force to prevent genocide.

Australia cannot make diplomacy its first line of defence until it reclaims the independence it has long surrendered to foreign alliances.

But the Court did hear Raheem's rather startling confession that a genocide was taking place:

This annihilation had only recently [been] labelled... genocide which is consistent with human history as a whole. Thats not the issue in these proceedings.

The Judge agreed with the prosecutor that actions taken in Gaza which constituted an offence of genocide did not excuse the duos conduct. Both were given good behaviour bonds lasting six months and made to pay a court levy of $150.

In remarks made toGuardian Australia, Robinson made the salient point:

Most Australian politicians, mutely, subserviently, persist in avoiding the matter. The errand boys and girls of the American empire remain an unquestioning bunch.

DrBinoy Kampmarkwas a Cambridge Scholar and is a lecturer atRMIT University. You can follow Dr Kampmark@BKampmark.