Angus Taylor's social media vetting of Australian values for visa holders will be costly, labour-intensive and ultimately untenable, but it's also One Nation damage control. DrAbul Rizviexamines how such a policy might play out in practice.
OPPOSITION LEADERANGUS TAYLORhas proposed to make 'compliance with theAustralian Values Statementa binding requirement for visa holders and enable visas to be refused or cancelled where individuals fail to uphold these values'.
Taylorwantsto:
So how big would this centre have to be if such screening were to operate for all visa applicants and visa holders, noting the existing character provisions in theMigration Actare already very broad?
A first step in establishing such an arrangement would be to provide detailed guidance to the visa processing staff in the proposed centre with actual and hypothetical examples of breaches of the Australian Values Statement so that they would know what to look for.
What kind of social media posts would be a breach of, for example:
Commitment to the rule of law?
Would criticism of the prosecution of Donald Trump on Facebook be a breach of this value? Would criticism of specific judges or judgments be a breach of this value? Would criticism of the prosecution ofBen Roberts-Smithbe a breach of this value?
Freedom of religion, freedom of speech and freedom of association?
Would criticism of certain religions be a breach of this value? Would criticism of unions be a breach of this value?
Equality of opportunity for all people regardless of gender, sexual orientation, age, disability, race, or national or ethnic origin?
Would criticism of gay people be a breach of this value?
"Fair go"for all?
Would criticism of Australias means-tested social welfare system be a breach of this value?
Clearly, these would be matters of degree. Just a once-off post that breaches an Australian Value may not be regarded as sufficient to lead to visa refusal or cancellation. (We dont know as Mr Taylor hasnt explained this). Difficult judgments may need to be made about a pattern of such breaches.
Many people use multiple social media sites, in different languages and to different degrees. Many people have been members of multiple social media sites for a decade or more. For these people, the task may take longer.
Coalitions Australian values test is the ultimate dog whistleSussan Leys so-called values test exposes the Coalitions desperation to court the far-Right under the guise of patriotism.
Lets assume, on average, it takes five hours to scrutinise a persons social media posts and make a judgment on whether they have breached an Australian Value. (That may include use of some sort of artificial intelligence to assist with the vetting.)It would include a write-up of the findings from the vetting, any natural justice process that is required and a recommendation as to whether Australian Values have or have not been sufficiently breached. This would be in addition to existing visa processes relevant to the type of visa applied for or held.
On average, there are around 250 working days per year. Using an average of an eight-hour working day, there are 2,000 working hours per year, per person. That would mean each staff member could vet the social media of around 400 visa applicants/holders per year.
On average, DHA processes more than 500,000 visa applications per month or more than 6million per year. That would mean the proposed centre may need around 15,000 additional processingstaff, plus supervisors/trainers/legal support/IT support and so on. And that is before we consider the possible vetting of the 3million temporary entrants currently in Australia and around 4million permanent residents.
There would inevitably be a significant increase in processing times and backlogs, which are already blowing out enormously. Many industries would feel the effects of much longer visa processing times, including tourism, educationand agriculture.
And ultimately, how many people would have their visa application refused/cancelled as a result of this additional social media vetting? If the number is tiny (which is highly likely), what will we have actually achieved? Many Australian citizens regularly breach Australian Values on their social media. That includes politicians, media personalities, influencers and so on.
Taylor would know all this. So why is he making such a fuss about social media vetting for Australian Values? In one word, Hanson.
DrAbul Rizviis an Independent Australia columnistand former Deputy Secretary of the Department of Immigration. You can follow Abul@RizviAbulor [email protected].
Related Articles
- CARTOONS: Angus Taylor is seriously talking turkey
- Taylor and Hume's 'Tarzan and Jane' 1950s revival
- Angus Taylor disowns Coalition policies behind 202223 migration surge
- Angus Taylors One Nationfication of the Liberal Party is Australias MAGA moment
- LEY DOWN! Libs forge on with "Fantastic" failure Angus Taylor liar, denier and water rorter
